Skip to main content
· 6/6/2002

Taxpayers for Sensible Priorities v. City of Dallas

Citations

  • 79 S.W.3d 670
  • 2002 Tex. App. LEXIS 4064
  • 2002 WL 1225683

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that extraneous documents were not part of contract with voters created by voter approval of bond proposition
  • holding that extraneous documents were not part of contract with voters created by voter approval of bond proposition
  • holding, following sale of general obligation bonds approved by city voters to develop waterway project and initiation of work on project, “It is elementary that the proceeds of bonds voted by the people must be expended for the purposes for which they were voted.”
  • bond proceeds may not be diverted from highway described in county order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Justices James, O'neill, and Francis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.