Skip to main content
· 3/27/1989

Taxation & Revenue Department v. Bien Mur Indian Market Center, Inc.

Citations

  • 770 P.2d 873
  • 108 N.M. 228

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the appellant “did not act reasonably in relying on the oral representations of the Department”
  • stating that the party seeking to establish estoppel must show that reliance was reasonable
  • considering assertion of reasonable reliance on oral representations of department and advice of attorney
  • refusing to apply estoppel when only oral representations were made and relied upon
  • “New Mexico cases recognize that, especially in cases involving assessment and collection of taxes, the state will be held estopped only rarely.”
  • in light of statute providing for estoppel, taxpayer did not act reasonably in relying on oral representations of Department

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ransom, Sosa, Stowers, Scarborough, Baca

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.