TAVARIS MC KINNIE v. STATE OF FLORIDA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that 50 percent enhancement in a wholly contingent risk case was not excessive
• upholding a 50 percent enhancement, which plaintiff had not appealed, as permissible but describing it as “below the Title VII contingency enhancements typically awarded in this circuit”
• upholding a 50 percent enhancement, which plaintiff had not appealed, as permissible but describing it as \below the Title VII contingency enhancements typically awarded in this circuit\
• awarding 25% enhancement for exceptional results where counsel “remained active in the litigation over a period of fifteen years”
• awarding twenty five percent enhancement for exceptional results and where counsel “remained active in the litigation over a period of fifteen years”
• district court properly considered “exceptional results” and “quality of representation” as factors in awarding enhancement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).