Tavarez v. Klingensmith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that employee-drivers, like all drivers, owe a personal duty “to exercise care on the public roadways”
• “[I]mposing broad personal liability on employees for conduct done solely on behalf of their employer would be abhorrent to public policy and would destroy the intended statutory protections for employers, by potentially subjecting them indirectly to dual liability”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).