· 1/3/1989
Tauriac v. Polaroid Corporation
Citations
- 716 F. Supp. 672
- 4 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 59
- 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124
- 49 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 38,748
- 48 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1256
- 1989 WL 89519
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ruling that in an employment discrimination case, there was no valid claim for loss of consortium under state's civil rights statute
- holding that neither federal nor Massachusetts state civil rights claims give rise to ancillary loss of consortium claims
- “it is doubtful that Massachusetts would recognize the validity of a consortium claim that is ancillary to a state law civil rights action”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tauro
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.