Skip to main content
· 1/3/1989

Tauriac v. Polaroid Corporation

Citations

  • 716 F. Supp. 672
  • 4 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 59
  • 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124
  • 49 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 38,748
  • 48 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1256
  • 1989 WL 89519

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling that in an employment discrimination case, there was no valid claim for loss of consortium under state's civil rights statute
  • holding that neither federal nor Massachusetts state civil rights claims give rise to ancillary loss of consortium claims
  • “it is doubtful that Massachusetts would recognize the validity of a consortium claim that is ancillary to a state law civil rights action”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tauro

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.