Tatum v. Tatum

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the determination of value “involves the consideration of the ages of two persons instead of one, and the consideration of the health, habits, and expectancy of life of both”
• “[I]t is said that ‘dower is favored in law in a high degree, and is held sacred only next to life and liberty.’” (quoting Crittenden v. Woodruff, 11 Ark. 82 (1850))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Wallace v. Wallace
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1929-02-18· cited 19×
• Skelly Oil Co. v. Murphy
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1930-02-03· cited 11×
• Kentucky Bank & Trust Co. v. Ashland Oil & Transportation Co.
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1958-02-14· cited 9×
• Quality Coal Company v. Guthrie
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1941-12-22· cited 7×
• B. H. M. Oil Company v. Graves
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1930-11-10· cited 5×
• ALABAMA VERMICULITE CORPORATION v. Patterson
  W.D. South Carolina· 1955-12-15· cited 3×
• Fletcher v. Felker
  W.D. Arkansas· 1951-05-25· cited 3×
• Childers v. Pollock
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1929-01-28· cited 3×
• Lathrop v. Sandlin
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1954-06-07· cited 3×
• In re Tankersley
  E.D. Arkansas· 2017-08-28· cited 2×
• United States v. Norman
  W.D. Arkansas· 1960-06-17· cited 1×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Watson v. Wolff-Goldman Realty Co.
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1910-05-02· cited 42×
• Cherokee Construction Co. v. Harris
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1909-11-08· cited 20×
• Smith v. Howell
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1890-05-17· cited 10×
• Rumsey v. Sullivan
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1914-11-11· cited 5×
• State v. Hussey
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1909-11-30· cited 1×