Tattersalls, Ltd. v. Jeffrey Dehaven

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding use of Rule 60(a) was proper to ensure the court’s purpose is fully implemented and to permit enforcement
• explaining Rule 60(a) is properly invoked to correct “blunders in execution” that 18 prevented an order or judgment from achieving “what the court originally intended to do” 19 (citations, quotation marks, and emphasis omitted)
• explaining Rule 60(a) is properly invoked 26 | to correct “blunders in execution” that prevented an order or judgment from achieving “what the 27 | court originally intended to do” (citations, quotation marks, and emphasis omitted)
• Rule 60(a) “allows a court to clarify a judgment in order to correct a failure to memorialize part of its decision, to reflect the necessary implications of the original order, to ensure that the court’s purpose is fully implemented, or to permit enforcement.”
• permitting new evidence relating to loss of 24 value
• permitting new evidence relating to loss of 24 value

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).