Skip to main content
· 1/12/2015

Tatten v. Bank of Am. Corp.

Citations

  • 135 S. Ct. 1022
  • 190 L. Ed. 2d 826
  • 83 U.S.L.W. 3579
  • 2015 U.S. LEXIS 106

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that subsequent events could extinguish an inchoate homestead interest and deprive a spouse from later challenging an otherwise voidable transaction
  • noting that if a surviving spouse wished to challenge irregularities in a mortgage transaction she should have done so prior to the divorce, which operated to extinguish her interest, making the transaction no longer voidable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.