· 1/12/2015
Tatten v. Bank of Am. Corp.
Citations
- 135 S. Ct. 1022
- 190 L. Ed. 2d 826
- 83 U.S.L.W. 3579
- 2015 U.S. LEXIS 106
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that subsequent events could extinguish an inchoate homestead interest and deprive a spouse from later challenging an otherwise voidable transaction
- noting that if a surviving spouse wished to challenge irregularities in a mortgage transaction she should have done so prior to the divorce, which operated to extinguish her interest, making the transaction no longer voidable
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.