Tatiana Poradisova, Pavel Poradisov, and Gennadi Poradisov v. Alberto Gonzales, 1

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the BIA has a duty to explicitly consider country conditions evidence that “materially bears on [an applicant’s] claim”
• recognizing that the agency has a duty to 6 consider evidence that materially bears on a movant’s claim
• holding that the BIA abused its discretion in denying a motion to reopen where it gave only a perfunctory summary of material evidence in the record
• concluding that the prima facie standard requires 16 an applicant to show a “‘realistic chance’ that he will be 17 able to establish eligibility” for asylum
• concluding that the prima 14 facie standard requires an applicant to show a “‘realistic 15 chance’ that he will be able to establish eligibility” for 16 relief
• holding that “we require a certain minimum level of analysis . . . if judicial review is to be meaningful” and that agency must “explicitly consider” material country conditions evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).