Skip to main content
· 7/25/1895

Tate's Ex'r v. Hull

Citations

  • 2 Va. Dec. 161
  • 22 S.E. 502

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that, under ORS 656.126(1), the employee was a subject worker

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.