· 11/28/1978
Taterka v. Ford Motor Co.
Citations
- 271 N.W.2d 653
- 86 Wis. 2d 140
- 25 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 680
- 1978 Wisc. LEXIS 1243
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying several U.C.C. provisions to consumer's demand to Ford to repair latent defect in the taillight assembly gaskets
- applying several U.C.C. provisions to consumer's demand to Ford to repair latent defect in the taillight assembly gaskets
- “The ordinary purpose for which a car is intended is to provide transportation.”
- same—33 months and 75,000 miles
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Connor T. Hansen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.