Tate v. Tate

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• wife entitled to permanent periodic alimony in light of sharp disparity in parties' education, income and earning capacity
• no dispute that spouse entitled to credit; however, court remanded to have right to credit made explicit in judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Brandt v. Brandt
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-06-01· cited 40×
• Linn v. Linn
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-02-27· cited 20×
• Tinsley v. Tinsley
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-06-24· cited 18×
• French v. French
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-07-05· cited 17×
• Kelly v. Kelly
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-02-21· cited 13×
• Adams v. Adams
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-02-27· cited 5×
• Gabriel v. Gabriel
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-07-07· cited 3×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Canakaris v. Canakaris
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1980-03-27· cited 2,288×
• McAllister v. McAllister
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-04-01· cited 71×
• Tolin v. Tolin
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-08-05· cited 8×
• King v. King
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-09-15· cited 5×