Skip to main content
· 5/29/1827

Tate v. Stooltzfoos

Citations

  • 16 Serg. & Rawle 35
  • 1827 Pa. LEXIS 26

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where defendant waived right to reading of the information, trial court's subsequent and complete failure to arraign defendant \was a technical and harmless omission that did not deny defendant any rights.\ Supra p. 828

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Counsel, Duncan, Rogers, Took

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.