Skip to main content
· 2/13/2024

Tate v. State of Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • highlighting that '‘[w]e have refused to supplement the record when a party has filed [new] material without requesting leave of this court or has appended material to an appellate brief without filing a motion to supplement”
  • supplementing the record under Rule 10(e) where the parties relied on deposition testimony in their pleadings even though deposition was not filed with district court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.