Skip to main content
· 2/19/2004

Tate v. RIVERBOAT SERVICES, INC.

Citations

  • 305 F. Supp. 2d 916
  • 11 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 187
  • 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3099
  • 2004 WL 360564

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that plaintiff would not be prejudiced by vacatur of the default judgment because the case was instituted less than a year ago and had not progressed past the complaint
  • applying two-dismissal rule where “stipulation to dismissal” was not signed by all parties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moody

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.