Tate v. Jacksonville Terminal Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that counsel who petitions to withdraw from representation must comply with Anders and its progeny
• holding question regarding a court’s authority to order restitution implicates the legality of a sentence, and is not waivable
• finding that trial court committed reversible error when it instructed the jury that “under the circumstances it appears that the injuries suffered . . . constitute serious bodily injury. But that is a decision for you”
• “[W]e cannot underestimate the weight that a jury would afford the opinion of a trial judge who opines that the element of serious bodily injury was proven in a case.”
• citation omitted. -5- J-S28039-20 Additionally, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has explained that a proper Anders brief must (1) provide a summary of the procedural history and facts, with citations to the record; (2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).