Tate v. GTE Hawaiian Telephone Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \The employer may overcome the [section 386-85(1)] presumption only with substantial evidence that the injury is unrelated to the employment.\
• “The employer may overcome the [section 386-85(1)] presumption only with substantial evidence that the injury is unrelated to the employment.”
• “Because an injury must arise out of an employment-related risk, injuries occurring during vacation are generally not compensable.”
• “Injuries occurring on an employer’s premises are covered by workers’ compensation only insofar as they arise out of employment-related risks.” (Footnote omitted.)
• LIRAB’s failure to acknowledge statutory presumption of compensability of workers’ compensation claim did not constitute reversible error when the record reflected that presumption had been rebutted
• bolded emphasis and footnote added, italics in original, some internal brackets omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).