Tate v. Executive Management Services, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• assuming, for purposes of argument, \that there may be circumstances in which a person who rejects his supervisor's sexual advances has engaged in a protected activity\
• assuming, for purposes of argument, “that there may be circumstances in which a person who rejects his supervisor’s sexual advances has engaged in a protected activity”
• comparing LeMaire v. La. Dep’t of Transp. & Dev., 480 F.3d 383, 389 (5th Cir. 2007) (holding that a single, express rejection of sexual advances does not constitute “protected activity” for purposes of a retaliation claim
• “[W]e will overturn a jury only if we conclude that no rational jury could have found for the [prevailing party].”
• acknowledging a circuit split between the fifth and eight circuits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).