Tate v. Elliott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that corporate plaintiffs did not suffer domestic injuries because their injuries were felt outside the United States, and explaining it was immaterial where the predicate acts were performed
• finding that foreign corporate plaintiffs suffered their economic injuries where they were located, not where the RICO predicate acts occurred
• declining to take judicial notice of facts in a book because they were subject to reasonable dispute
• taking judicial notice of the existence of the complaint, stay, and corporate disclosure statement filed in Southern District of New York case, “but not for the truth of the matters asserted therein.”
• “[A] constructive trust is not a cause of action, but an equitable remedy based upon an established cause of action”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).