Tate v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that right to appeal should not be \lost by creating a requirement not absolutely necessary from the literal words of the rule\
• stating that right to appeal should not be \lost by creating a requirement not absolutely necessary from the literal words of the rule\
• stating that right to appeal should not be “lost by creating a requirement not absolutely necessary from the literal words of the rule”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).