Tate v. Butler Cty. Dog Warden

Citations

• 254 N.E.3d 770
• 2024 Ohio 4732

Syllabus

The trial court erred by upholding the dog warden's decision designating appellant's dog as a \dangerous dog\ under R.C. 955.11(A)(1)(a)(ii) where the dog warden failed to provide any evidence that appellant's dog killed his neighbor's dog without provocation, regardless of whether that be by someone or something, as such decision was against the manifest weight of the evidence.