Appellate Court of Illinois· 8/28/1980

Tassan v. United Development Co.

Citations

410 N.E.2d 902
88 Ill. App. 3d 581
43 Ill. Dec. 769
1980 Ill. App. LEXIS 3626

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

determining that a developer-vendor of condominium units could be held liable for breach of implied warranty of habitability
determining that a developer-vendor of condominium units could be held liable for breach of implied warranty of habitability
acknowledging that a condominium association would not have standing to assert a claim for breach of implied warranty of habitability “but for the fact that [section 9.1(b) of the Act] apparently gives the association standing to assert the unit owners’ rights in the common elements”
acknowledging that a condominium association would not have standing to assert a claim for breach of implied warranty of habitability \but for the fact that [section 9.1(b) of the Act] apparently gives the association standing to assert the unit owners' rights in the common elements\
extending the implied warranty of habitability to developer-vendors and condominium purchasers
extending the implied warranty of habitability to developer-vendors and condominium purchasers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Linn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

56 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.