Skip to main content
· 5/3/1999

Tarzia v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Citations

  • 248 Conn. 920
  • 734 A.2d 569
  • 1999 Conn. LEXIS 168

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that, in Reed, “it was held that, inasmuch as the purposes for which the land was conveyed were particularly set forth in that deed, the property could not be sold or applied to any other use; and that any attempt ... would cause it to revert to the heirs of the original grantor”
  • Constitution did not prohibit the legislative act
  • Constitution did not prohibit the legislative act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.