Tarwater v. Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding a determination adequately documented where the record included “a short summary of the balancing that took place” and noting further that “such balancing is entitled to a presumption of regularity”
• “The government may use a variety of techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price.” (citing 48 C.F.R. § 15.404-l(b)(2))
• “[Bjecause this post-competitive range challenge to the competitive range determination is sufficiently analogous to a post-award challenge to award, the 'substantial chance' test is the appropriate standard under which to evaluate plaintiff's claim.”
• “A court reviewing a best value procurement agency action must be highly deferential, and the agency that made the determination in question is presumed to have acted in a reasonable and rational manner.”
• “A court reviewing a best value procurement agency action must be highly deferential, and the agency that made the determination in question is presumed to have acted in a reasonable and rational manner.”
• “[The protestor] lodged its protest before the contract was awarded, but after the competitive range had been determined. . . . The factual record in this case is fully developed regarding the disputed issue: the competitive range determination.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).