Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2/2/2000
Tarver v. State
Citations
- 761 So. 2d 266
- 2000 WL 122593
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- constitutional claims are subject to the limitations period in Rule 32.2(c)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Mashburn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2013-07-12· cited 36×
- Ex Parte StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2000-10-06· cited 25×
- Arthur v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2001-04-25· cited 22×
- Ex Parte State of AlabamaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2001-11-09· cited 9×
- Ex Parte SandersSupreme Court of Alabama· 2001-02-23· cited 7×
- Tarver v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2000-04-13· cited 7×
- Wright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2000-03-01· cited 6×
- Citizenship Trust v. Keddie-HillSupreme Court of Alabama· 2011-01-14· cited 4×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. TarverCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1993-12-10· cited 97×
- Tarver v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1986-06-10· cited 66×
- Ex Parte TarverSupreme Court of Alabama· 1986-12-12· cited 55×
- Silva v. CrainNinth Circuit· 1999-02-26· cited 45×
- Horsley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1996-02-13· cited 20×
- Nicastro v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1992-07-24· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.