Tarver v. Garlington

Citations

• 27 S.C. 107
• 2 S.E. 846
• 1887 S.C. LEXIS 102

Syllabus

<p>While it may be that parol testimony is generally inadmissible to show that defendant was the principal to an unsealed note signed by another as agent, and in which the name of the principal is not disclosed, yet a complaint on such a note, setting it out in full, and alleging that it was signed by the writer as agent for the defendant, cannot be held on demurrer not to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.</p>