Tarulli v. Circuit City Stores, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Having found the procedural element of an unconscionability claim not satisfied, this Court need not address the Plaintiffs substantive unconscionability arguments.”
• “[T]he Supreme Court and Second Circuit have both held that conditioning employment on the acceptance of an agreement to arbitrate disputes, including those arising under civil rights laws, is not itself unlawfully coercive.” (internal quotations marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).