· 2/15/2008
Tarte v. United States
Citations
- 249 F.R.D. 856
- 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11629
- 2008 WL 449945
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- compelling production of documents relating to defendants’ business or corporate structure such as articles of incorporation, corporate charters, by-laws, etc.
- “Evidence pertaining to aggregate reserve information, however, is discoverable and generally not protected by the work product doctrine or the attorney-client privilege.”
- “The scope of discovery under Rule 26(b) is extremely broad”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rosenbaum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.