Tartaglione v. Shaw's Express, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding on summary judgment that workers were independent contractors where the plaintiff did not “present[] sufficient evidence that [the defendant] exercised control over the manner” in which the workers transported the cargo
• owner and truck driver who had choice of routes and furnished own gas and oil were independent contractors
• “[A]n independent contractor is one who . . . is not subject to the control of the person with whom he has contracted, except as to the result of his work.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).