Tarry v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing Tarry’s conviction, in light of burden on state to prove no prejudice where the record did not show what was said when judge went to the jury room to answer a substantive question
• reversing Tarry's conviction, in light of burden on state to prove no prejudice where the record did not show what was said when judge went to the jury room to answer a substantive question
• affirming two rape convictions involving same victim because “the two acts of rape were of a different nature and were separated in point of time. A separate impulse was necessary for the commission of each offense”
• two acts of rape were of a different nature (digital and penile penetration), were separated in time and each was accompanied by a separate impulse
• visit to answer question about parole eligibility

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).