Tarpy v. Lexington & Eastern Railroad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that the plaintiffs had failed to establish the defendants “directed, planned, or committed the violations that occurred in China”
• holding that defendant’s U.S. corporate citizenship “in and of itself is not enough to touch and concern the United States with sufficient force for the ATS to apply”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).