Skip to main content
· 9/19/2006

Tarlton v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE

Citations

  • 201 S.W.3d 564
  • 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1390
  • 2006 WL 2670153

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating documents not contained in a legal file are not part of the appellate record, cannot be relied on by the parties, and appellate courts cannot consider the [information] in appellate review
  • “We note that although the revocation period of Driver‟s driving privileges has elapsed, the issue on appeal is not moot because its resolution affects Driver‟s driving record.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mary K. Hoff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.