Tarlotting v. Bokern

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that statement was not offer to compromise disputed claim but was admission of contractual obligations
• “The trial court’s ruling did not rest upon the challenged testimony, and, after reviewing the record, we are satisfied that the plaintiff was not prejudiced by its admission.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).