Skip to main content
· 2/5/2002

Tarlochan Sidhu v. The Flecto Company, Inc.

Citations

  • 279 F.3d 896
  • 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1115
  • 2002 Daily Journal DAR 1409
  • 169 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2321
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 1720
  • 2002 WL 171937

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a 14 common nucleus of facts is often “outcome determinative under the first res judicata element”
  • explaining that “rights asserted in the two actions [we]re different” because they involved infringement of different provisions of a contract
  • “[The plaintiff] can pursue a § 301 claim without exhausting the grievance procedures if [the defendant] repudiated those procedures.”
  • “If the employer repudiates the procedures established in a CBA .to govern a particular grievance, the aggrieved employee is relieved of the usual requirement to exhaust administrative remedies as to that grievance”
  • preclusion applies when “the earlier suit ... (1) involved the same ‘claim’ or cause of action as the later suit, (2) reached a final judgment on the merits, and (3) involved identical parties or privies.”
  • preclusion applies when “the earlier suit ... (1) involved the same ‘claim’ or cause of action as the later suit, (2) reached a final judgment on the merits, and (3) involved identical parties or privies.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reinhardt, Hawkins, Rawlinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.