Tarkow v. Tarkow

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the trial court is required to take into consideration the tax treatment and consequences of the alimony award where there is evidence of such (citing Farley v. Farley, 800 So.2d 710, 712 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001))
• reversing alimony award and remanding for recalculation where the trial court failed to consider the tax consequences of the award
• “The GM’s calculations of the Former Wife’s income ... should have reflected current reality.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lafferty v. Lafferty
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-03-28· cited 5×
• Librizzi v. Librizzi
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-06-09· cited 3×
• Lostaglio v. Lostaglio
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-09-16· cited 2×
• Barlow v. Barlow
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-08-16· cited 1×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Woodard v. Woodard
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-03-31· cited 36×
• Miller v. Miller
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-11-05· cited 26×
• Kaaa v. Kaaa
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2011-03-31· cited 24×
• Farley v. Farley
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-12-05· cited 18×
• Greenberg v. Greenberg
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-07-05· cited 14×
• Laz v. Laz
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-12-04· cited 13×
• Tarkow v. Tarkow
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-08-24· cited 5×