Target Stores v. Automated Maintenance Services, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant was only severally liable for its negligence, so it did not have a contribution claim
• holding that defendant was only severally liable for its negligence, so it did not have a contribution claim
• holding that defendant was only severally liable for its negligence, so it did not have a contribution claim
• holding, absent a claim of concerted action, a sued tortfeasor cannot maintain third-party claim for contribution against a tortfeasor not sued by injured claimant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).