Skip to main content
· 9/1/1967

Target Stores, Inc. v. Twin Plaza Co.

Citations

  • 153 N.W.2d 832
  • 277 Minn. 481
  • 1967 Minn. LEXIS 968

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that title was unmarketable because there was “serious doubt” as to whether unrecorded prior lease agreements created an adverse interest in the property, even if the alleged defects did not actually affect the title to the real property
  • drawing the same distinction and indicating that “[t]he fact that a document covers a building yet to be constructed implies that the transaction is at most an agreement to lease rather than a lease”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sheran

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.