Target National Bank v. Higgins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• evidence of similar past injuries involving a product was admissible to establish defendant’s knowledge that the product was defective prior to the date of the plaintiff’s injury
• Because the estimated cost of future medical services is not within the layperson’s general knowledge, the requirement of [expert] testimony eliminates the prospect that the jury’s award will be speculative.’”
• estimated cost of future medical expenses not within common knowledge of jury
• estimated cost of future medical expenses not within common knowledge of jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).