Target Market Publishing, Inc. v. Advo, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Supreme Court does not require an evidentiary hearing in every case
• affirming exclusion of expert report on lost profits from joint business venture based on the report’s unsupported assumptions regarding, inter alia, the product’s penetration into new markets
• finding no abuse of discretion in a district court’s exclusion of an expert’s opinions as to damages that, although regarding forecasted profits and not a unilateral pricing decision, depended on “certain assumptions that had not yet, and might never, come to pass”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).