Taree v. Spriggs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that § 3724 provided an adequate post-deprivation remedy where the defendants were alleged to have destroyed the plaintiff’s property, either negligently or willfully
• dismissing Fifth Amendment due process claim for destruction of property because “an adequate post-deprivation was available to plaintiff under 31 U.S.C. § 3724”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).