Skip to main content
· 12/20/2000

Tarascio v. United States

Citations

  • 198 F.R.D. 321
  • 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20256
  • 2000 WL 1910641

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling that named plaintiff did not have standing to maintain class claims against defendant whose individual conduct could not have caused any harm to the named plaintiff
  • holding that the law firm did not meet its burden of showing adequacy where the two leads partners were indicted by a federal jury for fraud and obstruction of justice for paying millions of dollars in illegal kickbacks to lead plaintiffs
  • “Recognizing the inappropriateness of using FIFO in this context, a number of courts compute gains and losses using the … LIFO [method] when choosing a Lead Plaintiff”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.