Tarango, Juan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that counsel’s performance was deficient when, in the face of certain deportation, he advised his client that deportation was only a possibility
• recognizing that “it was not enough for counsel to advise appellant that he might be deported; rather, counsel was required to inform appellant that, under these circumstances, his deportation was a virtual legal certainty”
• recognizing counsel was “obligated to inform appellant of the ‘presumptively mandatory’ immigration-law consequences of his plea that would make him ‘subject to automatic deportation’”
• instructing that an applicant for a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus bears the burden of proving his claim by a preponderance of the evidence
• stating that the appellant is prejudiced as a result of counsel's errors when, but for those errors, there is a reasonable probability of a different outcome
• stating that an appellant is prejudiced as a result of counsel’s errors when, but for those errors, there is a reasonable probability of a different outcome

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).