Tara McDaniel v. Clive Ryan and LaFree Ryan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that double jeopardy was violated by resentencing of defendant who had fully served one of two alternative sentences
• holding that double jeopardy principles forbid any increase in a defendant’s sentence once that sentence has been served or executed
• stating that common law, the Constitution, and “the dearest principles of personal rights” all forbade the action of the trial court
• establishing that the Double Jeopardy Clause bars a second prosecution only if jeopardy attached in the original proceeding
• noting that the trial court did have constitutional authority to modify the sentence upwards so long as that sentence had not been \executed.\
• holding the prohibition against double jeopardy forbids any increase in a defendant’s sentence once that sentence has been served or executed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).