Tar v. Model Bakery Co.

Citations

• 100 Wash. 442
• 171 P. 247
• 1918 Wash. LEXIS 761

Syllabus

<p>Appeal—Recobd—Statement of Pacts. In the absence of a statement of facts, errors in the rejection of evidence cannot be reviewed, nor the merits of instructions determined, unless they would be wrong under any conceivable facts.</p> <p>Appeal—Review—Habmless Ebeob—Instbuctions—Comment on Evidence. In the absence of the evidence, it cannot be said to be an unlawful comment on the evidence for the court, in its instructions, to state that, according to the evidence of the physician, plaintiff was suffering from occupational dermatitis, which simply meant inflammation due to dishwashing.</p>