Taquila Monroe v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia

Oral argument

• Argued

  32 min recording
  Listen

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \A regular course of similar prior dealings may suggest a valid business expectancy.\
• in bidding situation, extensive prior relations with customer created protectable business expectancy in supplier
• “Each party must do nothing destructive of the other party’s right to enjoy the fruits of the contract and do everything the contract presupposes they will do to accomplish its purpose.”
• “decision not to give [plaintiff] the assistance it gave other authorized dealers, however, could be viewed by a jury as part of a concerted effort to deny [plaintiff] the ... job and divert the business to [another individual].”
• New Jersey act narrower because it does not include oral arrangements
• noting plaintiffs “extensive prior dealings”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).