Tape Industries Ass'n of America v. Younger

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• agreeing that futility argument lacked merit where employee \never even asked for 70/80 retirement\
• upholding district court’s denial of leave to amend, reasoning that “it is plain that allowing the amendment here would inject new issues into the case requiring extensive discovery”
• “Although the exhaustion requirement is strictly enforced, courts have recognized an exception when resort to the administrative process would be futile.”
• where an employee is constructively discharged, employee would not necessarily have to return to work in order to have standing to claim a make whole remedy
• “[T]his Circuit has apparently rejected the reasoning that substantive remedies, such as the severance pay the Employees seek on appeal, are available for violations of ERISA’s procedural requirements.”
• “The Employees are not required to exhaust their administrative remedies before seeking judicial relief on their claim that Edgewater's amendment of the Plan violates § 510 of ERISA”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).