Tapager v. Birmingham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that plaintiff knew of university’s conduct when she was instructed to vacate her residence and notified that she was no longer a student and that internal appeal process did not toll running of statute of limitations
• granting university’s motion to dismiss student’s 19 claims challenging dismissal from university, finding that the claims accrued when the plaintiff received notice of expulsion, notwithstanding the plaintiff’s appeal of that decision
• ADA and Rehabilitation Act claims subject to Indiana’s two-year statute of limitations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).