Tanya J. Fjelsta v. Zogg Dermatology, Plc

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Holding affidavit, stating merely that alleged defamer said “something about [plaintiff] endangering patients,” “was too vague to support an inference that [defamer] had accused [plaintiff] of endangering patient safety”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).