Tanya Buckner v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner, Social Security Administration

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the claimant's employment history suggested that her ability to work was not more than slightly affected by her physical impairments
• stating that court may reverse the Commissioner’s decision outright if overwhelming evidence supports a finding of disability
• noting that the claimant's employment history suggested that her ability to work was not more than slightly affected by her physical impairments
• stating that court may reverse the Commissioner's decision outright if overwhelming evidence supports a finding of disability
• finding that remand was warranted for “additional evaluation of existing evidence and for further development of the record regarding [claimant’s] ability to perform past relevant work”
• finding that remand under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. section 405(g) is proper when the apparent purpose of the remand was to prompt additional fact-finding and further evaluation of existing facts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).