Tanning Research Laboratories, Inc. v. Worldwide Import & Export Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[Djefendants have offered no probative evidence raising a genuine issue of material fact regarding their willfully blind violation.”
• “[The] assertion that plaintiffs must prove that defendants’ unauthorized products were inferior ... would turn the Lanham Act on its head. Congress hardly intended to step through the looking glass into a world in which valid trademark owners were only protected from inartful counterfeiters.”
• finding likelihood of confusion on motion for summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).